------- Comment #2 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-08-14 14:28 
-------
I'll try to deal with that one, it looks nasty (although target-specific).
Thanks for the bug-report.

  1. Can you report what HP-PA architecture this is happening on? And the OS?
(I have access to HP testdrive, if need arise I can try it there once I know
the answer to these questions.)

  2. It may or may not be of help, but I should note that there was a powerpc
back-end bug at some point that this behaviour: PR30406. Can you try compiling
the following code, without -fdefault-integer-8 (and, in case it does not fail,
with -fdefault-integer-8)?

    function f(l)
    logical(8) :: f
    logical(8) :: l
    f = .not.l
    end function f


  3. Actually, thinking about it more, the code in gcc/config/pa/pa.c looks
close to that in gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c where the problem was fixed. Could
you also try the following patch?

Index: gcc/config/pa/pa.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/config/pa/pa.c  (revision 127394)
+++ gcc/config/pa/pa.c  (working copy)
@@ -9075,7 +9075,7 @@ function_value (tree valtype, tree func
     }

   if ((INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (valtype)
-       && TYPE_PRECISION (valtype) < BITS_PER_WORD)
+       && GET_MODE_BITSIZE (TYPE_MODE (valtype)) < BITS_PER_WORD)
       || POINTER_TYPE_P (valtype))
     valmode = word_mode;
   else


  4. Do you have testresults on this platform, and does
gfortran.dg/logical_3.f90 PASS?


-- 

fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu   |fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |dot org                     |org
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |ASSIGNED
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2007-08-14 14:28:08
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33062

Reply via email to