------- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-08 18:55 ------- data[i] = (i%2==0) ? new(alloc.value()) unsigned(2) : new(alloc()) unsigned(1);
D.2395 = value (&alloc); D.2367 = D.2395; D.2396 = operator() (&alloc); unsigned int * D.2367; <<cleanup_point <<< Unknown tree: expr_stmt (void) (D.2367 = value (&alloc)) >>> >>; unsigned int * D.2384; <<cleanup_point <<< Unknown tree: expr_stmt (void) (D.2384 = operator() (&alloc)) >>> >>; -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot | |org Keywords| |wrong-code Summary|Wrong optimisation |[4.3 Regression] Wrong | |calling of placement new | |with conditionals Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33025