------- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-08 17:27 -------
>should not segfault (which it does).
Not when you consider the stack pointer will wrap and increase (instead of
decrease) by 8.
Again this is only undefined C99. (this code is invalid C90 and C++98 anyways
as variable length arrays are not in C90/C++98).
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33024
