------- Comment #2 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2007-08-06 05:10 ------- Why do the other reports show no "FAIL" lines and no line like "# of unexpected failures 122" ? Was the "C" compiler _perfect_ yesterday?
You may need to fix this again: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32783#c4 (see last line of the comment). We need to work on our English, your reply takes a rude tone. I know someone who teaches English, you don't want a visit. If every thing was working fine in the "C" portion of GCC (unlikely) and there were indeed NO errors _yesterday_; you might have said that instead - and get someone to fix the 122 errors (in the "C" compiler) that I am reporting (mostly DFP). It is unlikly that up until "gcc version 4.2.2 20070804" there were ZERO errors in the "gcc summary" as of this month. In any event, there are some now. -- rob1weld at aol dot com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED Resolution|INVALID | Version|4.3.0 |4.2.2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32999
