------- Comment #13 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-27 20:51
-------
(In reply to comment #12)
> Thanks gfortran team!
Hum, thanks for the thanks! However, I feel it would be better to keep this
open because the code that the front-end previously generated was OK and
exposed a real bug in the middle-end, which might come and bite us again later.
So, I'm reopening this, unless a middle-end maintainer wants to shut it himself
as INVALID or WONTFIX.
Also, I'm raising this to priority P1, as is appropriate (if I understand
correctly) for a ice-on-valid-code regression.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
GCC build triplet|i686 |
GCC host triplet|i686 |
GCC target triplet|i686 |
Priority|P3 |P1
Resolution|FIXED |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32720
