------- Comment #1 from pcarlini at suse dot de  2007-07-26 19:35 -------
Well, in our current, C++03, implementation, definitely list::size is O(N). The
issue is thorny, as you know well. For C++0x, Howard has a proposal related to
the additional splice overload, I'm not sure which is the progress on that...


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32907

Reply via email to