------- Comment #16 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-07-20 16:05 
-------
That makes it

foo:
        movl    4(%esp), %ecx
        movl    8(%esp), %edx
        movl    8(%ecx,%edx,4), %eax
        addl    4(%ecx,%edx,4), %eax
        addl    12(%ecx,%edx,4), %eax
        ret

for me.  Still different from what you claim.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32698

Reply via email to