------- Comment #8 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-12 18:41 ------- > Concerning the compiling sequence: I am aware that the program interpfxlv > needs the three modules (parametri, thom_mod and spline) to work, but I was > wondering if there is a way to tell gfortran to follow the right sequence on > it's own.
I'm not aware of any compiler able to do so. Most compilers are single pass and need the information right away. One could create a script which spits out an ordered file list: Simply grepping for the MODULE name and for the USE statements, building a tree and starting to write the filenames starting from the leafs of that tree. > The problem is: why do I get the final internal compiler error > once I have the three modules in the directory? Ups, I missed that. An internal compiler error should never ever happen; but it happens for valid usage this really bad. (However, I cannot reproduce it here on x86-84/Linux; if the following does not work, some gfortraner with Windows has to debug it.) Could you try with a newer gfortran: http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortranBinaries#Windows just to rule out that is has been fixed in meanwhile. Otherwise: a) Does it work if you use the "right" order (see comment #6) b) If you compile it one by one in alphabetical order (with .mod present), where does it break? c) If you have by chance a valgrind or a debugger (breakpoint "fancy_abort" or "internal_error"), a backtrace or valgrind output would be highly welcome too. (Run gfortran -v -c file.f95 and use the line which contains "f951" in the debugger/valgrind.) -- burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |ice-on-valid-code http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32737
