Hi,

Compiling following testcase for "h8sx" target with optimization (-O1
onwards), gives ICE (internal compiler error) . The testcase works fine
for other H8 targets.


// Start Of Testcase

=======================================================================

#include <stdlib.h>

typedef union
{
        unsigned long LONG;
        struct
        {
                unsigned long Year : 14,
                                  Month : 18;
        } Bit;
} test;

typedef struct
{
        unsigned int year ;
} Date;

unsigned int foo(Date *ptr_Date)
{
        Date obj_Date;
        test obj_test;

        obj_test.LONG = 2000;
        obj_Date.year = (unsigned int)obj_test.Bit.Year;

        if(ptr_Date!=NULL) *ptr_Date=obj_Date;
        return(0);
}

=======================================================================

// End Of Testcase

When I compile above testcase with "-msx -O1" options, i get following error
message,

internal compiler error: in gen_rtx_SUBREG, at emit-rtl.c:693

What can be the possible reason behind the same?
Thanks and Regards,
Sushil Kothawade

KPIT Cummins InfoSystems Ltd.
Pune, India
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Free download of GNU based tool-chains for Renesas' SH, H8, R8C, M16C
and M32C Series. The following site also offers free technical support
to its users. Visit http://www.kpitgnutools.com for details.
Latest versions of KPIT GNU tools were released on June 1, 2007.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


-- 
           Summary: ICE for H8SX when compiled with optimization
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.2.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: rtl-optimization
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: Sushil dot Kothawade at kpitcummins dot com
 GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux
  GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux
GCC target triplet: h8300-unknown-elf


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32739

Reply via email to