------- Comment #8 from vmpn at hitechman dot com 2007-07-01 19:38 ------- Created an attachment (id=13815) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13815&action=view) Test case fixed using forward declarations
Thank you for your help. I think I now have a better understanding of what is going on. As far as GCC is concerned the overriding visit_each template function dealing with MyData does not exist when it makes its decision regarding visit_each(v, data, 0); call. I am attaching fixed (working with 4.1) text case that is more representative of the boost structure (to the best of my understanding). Also, I will be using it as a base for a follow up issue I ran into. I am also including couple of relevant links for better context to this issue for anyone else who might stumble on this entry: Two Phase looks ups and GCC: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11828 http://groups.google.com/group/comp.std.c++/msg/6a53b35efe39fee3 http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.4/changes.html http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Name-lookup.html http://developer.apple.com/releasenotes/DeveloperTools/RN-GCC4/index.html IMHO, the changes are mentioned as early as gcc 3.4 but they did not seem to fully kick in until gcc 4.x. Related boost email and change that I found: http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2006/04/103989.php http://boost.cvs.sourceforge.net/boost/boost/boost/bind.hpp?r1=1.55&r2=1.56 Regards, Vladimir -- vmpn at hitechman dot com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #13808|0 |1 is obsolete| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31164
