------- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-25 19:56 ------- > Additionally: It would be great if there would be a variant for long integers > (8 byte integers) and long long (16 byte integers) as PR32239 could only use > __builtin_powi for int4 and not for int8 or int16.
Actually, gfortran uses also: pow(integer,integer) and pow(complex,integer), which could also profit from a middle/back-end support. (integer: 4, 8, 16 bytes; complex: single, double, long double precision). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32503
