------- Comment #1 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-06-20 15:53 ------- This is a known behavior (we even have testcases for it): the issue is that (for C++03 at least) we definitely want consistency with "C" scanf, and the latter in many implementations behaves "incorrectly". See this glibc PR of mine:
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1765 We can reconsider the issue in the C++0x context, not earlier than that. -- pcarlini at suse dot de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2007-06-20 15:53:53 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32422
