------- Comment #12 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-18 19:16 ------- (In reply to comment #11) > Yes, I agree that program is not beautiful > and I know the the array 'w' of 'u3b' subroutine problem; > I think the author of u3b use w(1) as pointer.
Change the 1 to *. > However, > the wrong generation of optimized code occurs in 'DP' subroutine. > The array of DP have fixed boundary. Do you get wrong results if you add the -ffloat-store option? Can you also try the -fdefault-real-8 option? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32391
