------- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-17 17:32
-------
> {{&BinomialCoefficients[0], +, 4}_1, +, {0, +, 4}_1}_1
> does not look good: the left part should be invariant in loop_1.
> It's most certainly the code in scev analysis that is in fault here.
> I'll have a look. Thanks for pointing me to the bug.
Ok, thanks. Just to let people know, {{&BinomialCoefficients[0], +, 4}_1, +,
{0, +, 4}_1}_1 was also showing up on the trunk before the pointer_plus was
merged in.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32367
