------- Comment #20 from dougkwan at google dot com 2007-06-14 18:05 ------- Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] Incorrect stack sharing causing removal of live code
That was my initial opinion too but Diego and Danny told me there is only one scope in the tree SSA form. So it is okay. About your comment of us being lucky, I believe our luck is running out. As we do more and more things in the tree passes, we will be likely to see this problem more often. 14 Jun 2007 17:58:01 -0000, ian at airs dot com <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > ------- Comment #19 from ian at airs dot com 2007-06-14 17:57 ------- > I don't agree with comment #17 from Doug. In the code in comment #16, if f > saves &c, there is no way that it could validly use it after the block scope > exits. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32327
