------- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-12 17:36 -------
>Do you mean that short_var + short_var is defined as
> (short)((unsigned short)short_var + (unsigned short)short_var)?
Kinda, because it is really defined by the C standard as:
(short)((int)short_var + (int)short_var)
And then GCC's middle-end optimizes it to:
(short)((unsigned short)short_var + (unsigned short)short_var)
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 26128 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32309
