------- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-08 07:52 ------- (In reply to comment #1) > no, this is OK (whether it is a good design choice is another thing, I will > think about that).
I actually have a fix for this issue (the MEM with just index: and offset:) but it is going to wait until after the pointer_plus merge. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31358
