------- Comment #4 from dorit at il dot ibm dot com 2007-06-07 18:40 -------
You're right. I'm testing this obvious patch:
Index: tree-vect-analyze.c
===================================================================
*** tree-vect-analyze.c (revision 125526)
--- tree-vect-analyze.c (working copy)
*************** vect_determine_vectorization_factor (loo
*** 173,181 ****
print_generic_expr (vect_dump, stmt, TDF_SLIM);
}
- if (TREE_CODE (stmt) != GIMPLE_MODIFY_STMT)
- continue;
-
gcc_assert (stmt_info);
/* skip stmts which do not need to be vectorized. */
--- 173,178 ----
*************** vect_determine_vectorization_factor (loo
*** 187,192 ****
--- 184,199 ----
continue;
}
+ if (TREE_CODE (stmt) != GIMPLE_MODIFY_STMT)
+ {
+ if (vect_print_dump_info (REPORT_UNVECTORIZED_LOOPS))
+ {
+ fprintf (vect_dump, "not vectorized: irregular stmt.");
+ print_generic_expr (vect_dump, stmt, TDF_SLIM);
+ }
+ return false;
+ }
+
if (!GIMPLE_STMT_P (stmt)
&& VECTOR_MODE_P (TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE (stmt))))
{
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32224
