------- Comment #28 from pluto at agmk dot net 2007-06-06 10:08 ------- (In reply to comment #27)
> It is not like GCC is a closed source program either, > you can try to make a fix for the issue too. Andrew, real world is not so simple ;) some time ago Manuel López-Ibáñez helps me create official patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7302#c22 patch was submitted: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-03/msg01347.html added to tracker: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7302#c23 and pinged: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-04/msg00604.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-05/msg00110.html c.a. 3 months and no effects for tested trivial patch. no accecpt, no reject, no commit, no fun. in current situation i feel no reason to working on another patch while the GCC-Team redirect external patches to /dev/null. moreover, gcc lists are full of patch-ping^N-noeffects. i think people are not motivated to cooperate with GCC-Team. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29365
