------- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2007-06-02 21:35 ------- Subject: Re: Complex __float128 is rejected
On Sat, 2 Jun 2007, gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu wrote: > | Of course, 6.7.2 paragraph 2 does not include _Complex typedef-name in the > | possible sets of type specifiers. > > Out of curiosity, do you happen to know why typedefs to floating point > types should be disallowed? Typedefs have never been allowed along with other type specifiers; it's much the same as not allowing "unsigned T" or "T unsigned" where T is a typedef for int. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32187
