------- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-01 07:49 ------- While the assert is occurs in the middle end, I think it is very likely a tree-type mismatch in the front end.
-- burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |burnus at gcc dot gnu dot | |org Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Keywords| |ice-on-valid-code Known to fail| |4.3.0 Known to work| |4.2.0 4.2.1 Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2007-06-01 07:49:47 date| | Summary|ICE on valid: tree check: |[4.3 Regression] ICE tree- |expected integer_cst, have |type mismatch: expected |plus_expr in int_cst_value, |integer_cst, have plus_expr |at tree.c:7720 |in int_cst_value, at | |tree.c:7720 Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32176