------- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-06-01 07:49 -------
While the assert is occurs in the middle end, I think it is very likely a
tree-type mismatch in the front end.


-- 

burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |burnus at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
           Keywords|                            |ice-on-valid-code
      Known to fail|                            |4.3.0
      Known to work|                            |4.2.0 4.2.1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2007-06-01 07:49:47
               date|                            |
            Summary|ICE on valid: tree check:   |[4.3 Regression] ICE tree-
                   |expected integer_cst, have  |type mismatch: expected
                   |plus_expr in int_cst_value, |integer_cst, have plus_expr
                   |at tree.c:7720              |in int_cst_value, at
                   |                            |tree.c:7720
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.3.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32176

Reply via email to