------- Comment #1 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-05-30 21:00 -------
Curious, this is actually a C++ front-end issue, a bug in my implementation of
__is_pod: currently it just forwards to pod_type_p, in cp/tree.c, and
apparently I was wrong to assume it exactly implements the Standard concept of
POD-ness: it returns true for std::pair, which is *not* a POD. The problem is
that std::pair isn't an aggregate type, thus cannot be a POD. I think I should
just also check CP_AGGREGATE_TYPE_P, in order to fix that. Mark, can you
confirm that? Thanks in advance.
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mark at codesourcery dot com
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |pcarlini at suse dot de
|dot org |
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Component|libstdc++ |c++
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2007-05-30 21:00:32
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32158
