------- Comment #15 from paolo dot bonzini at lu dot unisi dot ch 2007-05-21 09:41 ------- Subject: Re: [4.3 regression] : gcc.target/i386/pr21291.c
matz at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > ------- Comment #14 from matz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-21 09:35 ------- > Yes. The place where I would think the work-around to become definitive is > exactly before regclass. Between it and reload nothing interesting happens > transformation wise. I was thinking of the same. Also, if the patch included adding a "cfun->have_asm_statement" flag set during RTL expansion, it would probably cost little to do it in an entirely new pass before regclass. Paolo -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32004
