Just like PR 31995, this was found on the pointer plus branch after fixing forwprop (note fowrwprop could be improved even more but that is a different story and then we just get back to PR 31995 really), This testcase is really vect-103 but modified to confuse data-ref: /* { dg-require-effective-target vect_int } */
#include <stdlib.h> #include <stdarg.h> #include "tree-vect.h" #define N 9 struct extraction { int a[N]; int b[N]; }; static int a[N] = {1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9}; static int b[N] = {17,24,7,0,2,3,4,31,82}; static int c[N] = {9,17,24,7,0,2,3,4,31}; int main1 (int x, int y) { int i; struct extraction *p; p = (struct extraction *) malloc (sizeof (struct extraction)); for (i = 0; i < N; i++) { p->a[i] = a[i]; p->b[i] = b[i]; if (x == 135) abort (); /* to avoid vectorization */ } /* Vectorizable: distance > VF. */ for (i = 0; i < N; i++) { p->a[x + i] = *((int *)p + x + i + 8); } /* check results: */ for (i = 0; i < N; i++) { if (p->a[i] != c[i]) abort(); } return 0; } int main (void) { check_vect (); return main1 (0, N); } /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 1 loops" 1 "vect" } } */ /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "dependence distance modulo vf == 0" 1 "vect" } } */ /* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "vect" } } */ -- Summary: can't determine dependence between p->a[x+i] and *((int *)p + x + i + 8) Product: gcc Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31996