------- Comment #4 from baldrick at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-10 10:11
-------
I'm reopening this as an enhancement request. I agree that the
code currently produced is correct, i.e. executes as required
by the RM. However it is suboptimal and in my opinion (and
apparently in Eric's opinion too) the code quality can be improved
in gcc 4 with reasonable effort.
--
baldrick at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |enhancement
Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31877
