------- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-27 01:11 -------
Actually it is worse. I am going to close this as a dup of bug 31721 because
that bug shows the real issue, we are not regenerating the reference type
correctly, instead we are generating a pointer type.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 31721 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14217
