------- Comment #5 from jcavalla at postini dot com 2007-04-20 22:37 ------- 1. Please note that 'g++' was used to compile, not 'gcc' as stated below. Sorry.
2. I marked this bug 'major' instead or 'normal' because callers will not be able to determine whether or not they need to supply more input to complete a sequence. If in a read/convert type loop with preserved shift state across convert calls, this may not matter. I will run such a test and post the results. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31643
