------- Comment #10 from ddneilson at gmail dot com 2007-04-20 18:51 ------- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #8) > > The work around is doing: > > get_a().template func2 <int>(); > > > > > > Which tells the compiler for sure func2 is a template. > > > > Thanks, yeh I figured that out just now. Should it happen like this though? > Surely the compiler should be able to work out it's a template and therefore > not need the qualification? >
I was just about to report a similar bug, but it was also "fixed" by adding a "template" qualifier to the function call. However, when studying the bug I ran my test case through the xlC compiler. It compiles "get_a().func2<int>();" just fine; it doesn't need "get_a().template func2<int>();" syntax. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17000
