------- Comment #1 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-19 19:27 ------- On second thought, the implementation is simpler when NULL is not treated specially. But then there is a slight majority of the uses in the config directory that wants the old behaviour of get_unnamed_section, so it makes sense to use a new name for the new function - or macro - which does an ggc_strdup of the third argument.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31634
