------- Comment #11 from Catherine dot M dot Moroney at jpl dot nasa dot gov 2007-04-18 00:12 ------- Subject: Re: UBOUND as initialization expression (lacking simplification)
Well, thank-you for the quick turnaround on this patch! Francois - good luck on your thesis! I remember the struggle I had getting mine finished. Due on Monday, still running data Saturday night ... What's your thesis on? Catherine On Apr 17, 2007, at 3:51 PM, fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > > > ------- Comment #9 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-17 > 23:51 ------- > Created an attachment (id=13384) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13384&action=view) > --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13384&action=view) > Patch to fix this PR > > This patch should take care of the simplification. It hasn't been > fully tested > yet, but it appears to work fine on your code and a few other cases I > could > think of. It could take a week before I can formally submit it (thesis > under > writing...) > > Thanks for the bug report! > > > -- > > fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > ----- > AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |fxcoudert at gcc dot > gnu dot > |dot org |org > Status|NEW |ASSIGNED > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31591 > > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31591
