------- Comment #10 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-17 13:33 ------- (In reply to comment #8) > The patch looks good, though it would probably be a better idea to use > tmpnam() > to get the name for the temporary file.
Why not. But I like the idea that it is predictable :) > A further thing one could do: instead of threatening "If you edit this, you'll > get what you deserve.\n\n", one could actually verify that the MD5 sum matches > the files contents. Too expensive! I'm against this additional cost (plus the developer cost of writing and maintaining it). About testcases, you mean for the dejagnu testsuite? I have really no idea... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31587
