------- Comment #3 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2007-04-14 22:24 ------- Subject: Re: -Wall-all to enable all warnings
> ------- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-14 21:18 > ------- > Actually more than that, there are new warnings options each release so really > if we have this we will get complaints about warnings options get added. so I > am going to close this as won't fix. I also don't really see this ever happening because the libstdc++ headers aren't clean w.r.t. -Weffc++ (if you propose to turn those on too). Even the man page warns about it. (Vast majority seem to be "non-virtual destructor in base class" nonsense from my previous attempts.) Even if fine-grain, source-annotated warning suppressions (__attribute__, etc.) kick in, *some* of the extra warnings would be a nuisance to work-around, and extra work for library maintainers. FWIW, -W -Wall has served me quite well. (-W is -Wextra since 3.4) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31573
