------- Comment #8 from spark at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-03 23:50 -------
The following patch addresses the problem.
Do we want to add a flag to control this ?
--- a/gcc/cp/decl2.c Mon Apr 02 15:48:00 2007 +0000
+++ b/gcc/cp/decl2.c Tue Apr 03 22:45:49 2007 +0000
@@ -1860,9 +1860,13 @@ constrain_class_visibility (tree type)
int subvis = type_visibility (ftype);
if (subvis == VISIBILITY_ANON)
- warning (0, "\
+ {
+ if (strcmp (main_input_filename,
+ DECL_SOURCE_FILE (TYPE_MAIN_DECL (ftype))))
+ warning (0, "\
%qT has a field %qD whose type uses the anonymous namespace",
- type, t);
+ type, t);
+ }
else if (IS_AGGR_TYPE (ftype)
&& vis < VISIBILITY_HIDDEN
&& subvis >= VISIBILITY_HIDDEN)
@@ -1877,9 +1881,13 @@ constrain_class_visibility (tree type)
int subvis = type_visibility (TREE_TYPE (t));
if (subvis == VISIBILITY_ANON)
- warning (0, "\
+ {
+ if (strcmp (main_input_filename,
+ DECL_SOURCE_FILE (TYPE_MAIN_DECL (TREE_TYPE (t)))))
+ warning (0, "\
%qT has a base %qT whose type uses the anonymous namespace",
- type, TREE_TYPE (t));
+ type, TREE_TYPE (t));
+ }
else if (vis < VISIBILITY_HIDDEN
&& subvis >= VISIBILITY_HIDDEN)
warning (OPT_Wattributes, "\
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29365
