Eric Lemings wrote:
Is this a bug or new behavior? If the latter, what is this attributed
to?
FYI gcc-bugs isn't the best place to ask questions, as it is mostly used
for output from our bug database.
I'm not a C++ expert, so I'm not the right person to say for sure, but
this looks like an accidental bug to me. There were patches added to
change the bitfield type representation, the
is_bitfield_expr_with_lowered_type change, which is for PR 26534. I
believe these patches have an error.
It looks to me like the bug is in standard_conversion in cp/calls.c at
these lines
if (bitfield_type)
from = strip_top_quals (bitfield_type);
This sets from, but fails to set fcode, resulting in an inconsistency.
In this case, fcode is INTEGER_TYPE and from is now an enumeral type
after originally being an integer type. This causes a failure further
down in the tcode == BOOLEAN_TYPE code where we fail to match the
conditions due to this inconsistency.
I'd suggest opening a bug report.
--
Jim Wilson, GNU Tools Support, http://www.specifix.com
