------- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-15 09:40 ------- Yes, I'll restore 4.2.0 behavior here. Though maybe falling back to a function call to cexp would be more natural...
The Problem with Fortran and C++ is that they assume a C99 runtime and so they effectively set TARGET_C99_FUNCTIONS and provide fallback implementations. For example libgfortran contains #if !defined(HAVE_CEXP) #define HAVE_CEXP 1 double complex cexp (double complex z) { double a, b; double complex v; a = REALPART (z); b = IMAGPART (z); COMPLEX_ASSIGN (v, cos (b), sin (b)); return exp (a) * v; } #endif and C++ simply relies on the target cexp() functioning correctly. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31161