------- Comment #11 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-03-11 13:26 ------- (In reply to comment #10) > Note hovewer, that currently __cplusplus in the official GNU tree at least is > still *1*. Is it possible that only *Gentoo* GCC has an external patch > defining __cplusplus as 199711L???
But that doesn't matter, because the newly built FSF GCC still defines __cplusplus as 1 (in licpp/init.c, by the way). I'm lost... We badly need details about the behavior of the two snippets, a time-range for the appearance of the problem, anything to restrict the number of possibilities... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30915
