------- Comment #4 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-02 14:24 ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Does the patch need some work to remain up to date ?
The patch is from 2005, so I guess it is outdated. You would need to examine what are the conflicts and try to fix them. I find easier to do this by updating update a subversion working copy to 'Mar 2005', apply the patch, then 'svn up' and examine the conflicts. Even if the patch applies, there is no guarantee that it actually compiles or works. For example, 'warning' now has an additional parameter, so you would need to replace it with 'warning (0,'. Anyway, I am not sure whether a whole pass to implement this warning is actually needed or worth of it. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20459