------- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-27 06:55 -------
The comment from the code:
For pointer types we assume overflow doesn't happen.
That is true but you can cause an overflow to happen when you transform the
code this way.
Mine, I have a fix.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2007-02-27 06:55:50
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29715
