------- Comment #8 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-19 20:50 ------- (In reply to comment #6) > there is an implicit value conversion, boolean "false" to address "0". I think > that is the definition of -Wconversion, no? > > anyway, I'll work on a patch. >
Take a look at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-02/txt00054.txt and particularly at cp/call.c (convert_like_real). I think the warning should go there with the other NULL warnings. Cheers, Manuel. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30860
