------- Comment #11 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-18 18:50 ------- > It's not PR24427 that's the motivation for this backport, but PR 28173. > In fact, it was *your* request in comment #2 of PR28173 to backport this!
Well, I only requested that you comment on the proposed backport. And this was on 2006-09-13, so 5 months ago! > I'm a little disappointed you'd even question my decision/authority to > backport a regression fix. :-) I'm basically paid for that. :-) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24427
