------- Comment #6 from eweddington at cso dot atmel dot com 2007-02-14 16:48 ------- Same results with GCC 4.1.1:
00000000 <testfunc>: 0: af 92 push r10 2: bf 92 push r11 4: cf 92 push r12 6: df 92 push r13 8: ef 92 push r14 a: ff 92 push r15 c: 0f 93 push r16 e: 1f 93 push r17 10: f6 2e mov r15, r22 12: e4 2e mov r14, r20 14: a0 2e mov r10, r16 16: b1 2e mov r11, r17 18: c2 2e mov r12, r18 1a: d3 2e mov r13, r19 1c: 00 d0 rcall .+0 ; 0x1e <testfunc+0x1e> 1e: 8a e0 ldi r24, 0x0A ; 10 20: 00 d0 rcall .+0 ; 0x22 <testfunc+0x22> 22: 8f 2d mov r24, r15 24: 00 d0 rcall .+0 ; 0x26 <testfunc+0x26> 26: 8b e0 ldi r24, 0x0B ; 11 28: 90 e0 ldi r25, 0x00 ; 0 2a: 00 d0 rcall .+0 ; 0x2c <testfunc+0x2c> 2c: 8e 2d mov r24, r14 2e: 00 d0 rcall .+0 ; 0x30 <testfunc+0x30> 30: 86 e0 ldi r24, 0x06 ; 6 32: 00 d0 rcall .+0 ; 0x34 <testfunc+0x34> 34: 9d 2d mov r25, r13 36: 8c 2d mov r24, r12 38: 7b 2d mov r23, r11 3a: 6a 2d mov r22, r10 3c: 00 d0 rcall .+0 ; 0x3e <testfunc+0x3e> 3e: 1f 91 pop r17 40: 0f 91 pop r16 42: ff 90 pop r15 44: ef 90 pop r14 46: df 90 pop r13 48: cf 90 pop r12 4a: bf 90 pop r11 4c: af 90 pop r10 4e: 08 95 ret -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16563
