------- Comment #20 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-03 22:58 ------- Created an attachment (id=13003) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13003&action=view) preliminary patch
Manuel, I like your idea of letting the DejaGnu procs do most of the work and then modifying the regular expressions they've added to dg-messages, so I got sidetracked playing around with that; see the attached patch. It prepends warning/error prefixes defined for each language (which I've only defined for C and Fortran so far), and adds a generic dg-message for messages that don't use a common prefix. For some reason my setup for running individual tests is failing for tests with more than one message per line so I haven't yet tested dg-message. I now think that it's OK to wrap dg-error and dg-warning to modify dg-messages and keep using those names in the GCC tests. We should have fixes to all tests before adding the changes to mainline. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25241
