------- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-02 16:15 ------- This does the right thing and does not break anything. However, it is still not quite the definitive fix - it is not right for derived type components and gfc_default_initializer now does not look right. I'll need a few days on this one.
Paul Index: gcc/fortran/resolve.c =================================================================== *** gcc/fortran/resolve.c (revision 121497) --- gcc/fortran/resolve.c (working copy) *************** resolve_fl_variable (gfc_symbol *sym, in *** 5534,5540 **** int flag; int i; gfc_expr *e; ! gfc_expr *constructor_expr; const char *auto_save_msg; auto_save_msg = "automatic object '%s' at %L cannot have the " --- 5534,5540 ---- int flag; int i; gfc_expr *e; ! gfc_component *c; const char *auto_save_msg; auto_save_msg = "automatic object '%s' at %L cannot have the " *************** resolve_fl_variable (gfc_symbol *sym, in *** 5668,5685 **** } } /* 4th constraint in section 11.3: "If an object of a type for which component-initialization is specified (R429) appears in the specification-part of a module and does not have the ALLOCATABLE or POINTER attribute, the object shall have the SAVE attribute." */ ! constructor_expr = NULL; ! if (sym->ts.type == BT_DERIVED && !(sym->value || flag)) ! constructor_expr = gfc_default_initializer (&sym->ts); ! ! if (sym->ns->proc_name && sym->ns->proc_name->attr.flavor == FL_MODULE - && constructor_expr && !sym->ns->save_all && !sym->attr.save && !sym->attr.pointer && !sym->attr.allocatable) { --- 5668,5689 ---- } } + /* Do not use gfc_default_initializer to test for a default initializer + in the fortran because it generates a hidden default for allocatable + components. TODO - clean this up. */ + c = NULL; + if (sym->ts.type == BT_DERIVED && !(sym->value || flag)) + for (c = sym->ts.derived->components; c; c = c->next) + if (c->initializer) + break; + /* 4th constraint in section 11.3: "If an object of a type for which component-initialization is specified (R429) appears in the specification-part of a module and does not have the ALLOCATABLE or POINTER attribute, the object shall have the SAVE attribute." */ ! if (c && sym->ns->proc_name && sym->ns->proc_name->attr.flavor == FL_MODULE && !sym->ns->save_all && !sym->attr.save && !sym->attr.pointer && !sym->attr.allocatable) { -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |pault at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org | Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|2007-02-02 13:14:05 |2007-02-02 16:15:26 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30660