------- Comment #44 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-22 17:14
-------
Again this really has nothing to do with security except for the fact some
developers wrote security checking code that depends on overflow being defined
as wrapping which is not what the C standard says and what GCC decided a while
back (1992 or so) to be undefined. So in reality you have not proved why
people can't audit their code like they did in the first place to place the
undefined code in there.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30475
