------- Comment #13 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-20 12:32 ------- I am also interested in seeing if there are any (large signed) -> (small unsigned) and bring them to the discussion, where all positive values fit in the unsigned (so no warning) or there is a sign conversion.
About the (negative constant) -> unsigned type, I meticulously explained everything I wanted to said in my long email (the warning has been there forever, it was the only documented thing that Wconversion did until recently, it was the reason for splitting Wconversion, etc). So, I won't go there again, please, I would like to hear Joseph Myers's opinion. (And, in any case, I will implement whatever is decided as soon as I can). Meanwhile, let's see if those are the only issues with -Wconversion and libstdc++. I hope you are happy with this plan, ok? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30464
