------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-19 06:21 ------- Yes and this is not a bug, GCC is correct i is not defined as i is not a dependent name so it gets bound at parsing time instead of doing instatitation.
You might think because the base class is an inner template but you can specialize those too. Also read: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.4/changes.html Under "In a template definition, unqualified names will no longer find members of a dependent base (as specified by [temp.dep]/3 in the C++ standard). For example," -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30508
