------- Comment #29 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-18 17:36 ------- Oh and I meant "at", not get or []. at does bounds checking.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30475
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org Thu, 18 Jan 2007 09:36:41 -0800
------- Comment #29 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-18 17:36 ------- Oh and I meant "at", not get or []. at does bounds checking.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30475