------- Comment #4 from gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2007-01-05 21:11 ------- Subject: Re: wrong result
"pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > anther, consider an example definite[2] of 'offsetof', if you think | > that is undefined, it's almost impossible to give a definite of | > offsetof. | | > #define offsetof(TYPE,MEMBER) ((size_t)&((TYPE*)0)->MEMBER) | | The C standard still says that is undefined. See 6.5.3.2/4. | Also GCC has a builtin for offsetof to get around the undefinedness of the | above. The C front-end should probably warn -- the C++ front-end does. -- Gaby -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30368
