------- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-05 16:51 ------- (In reply to comment #4) > I guess we could try to provide a graceful degradation for such systems... The > use of dup() can probably be avoided if dup() isn't available, without too > much > degradation in the library features. access() can probably be emulated, or at > least its basic features. For ftruncate(), however, I don't see how to make it > work.
Except for newlib for spu-elf actually has dup, access and ftruncate now so this is not a generic newlib issue really. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21185
