------- Comment #15 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-04 11:51 ------- (In reply to comment #13) > The question is how did JSM get uclibc to work when he patched libstdc++ for > it > (PR 14939) ? Was he using a newer uclibc which actually has LFS support or > something else?
He forced LFS on for anybody that turned C++ support on (in buildroot, i assume). I've fixed this bug recently to honour the user's explicit settings. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30365
